🔗 Share this article

Last year, star Jude Law remarked he “didn’t fear any repercussions” for playing the Russian leader in a new film. The movie, however, could coincide too neatly with the carefully constructed version circulated by Russian state media that, within Russia, it reads as a compliment rather than a challenge.

The Manufactured Superhero

For years, the Kremlin and its entertainment industry have worked together to forge a tailor-made persona of Putin. This character is a political superhero without age or mistakes, a former spy reframed as a Russian James Bond who always knows beyond what he shows.

“Domestically, the manufactured Putin has long overshadowed the real one.”

Cinematic Reinforcement

One recent example is a television show released last fall, helmed by a pro-government filmmaker. The protagonist is a invented blue-eyed lieutenant colonel inexplicably chosen to “rescue” the nation from chaos. Although he is called a different name, the message is clear: the savior must be a known figure from the secret services.

Western portrayals frequently result in buttressing this same narrative rather than debunking it. A new film inspired by a bestselling satirical novel aims to undermine the Putin cult by framing him as a symptom but as a consequence, moving the narrative weight to the spin doctors surrounding him.

The Myth of the Reluctant Leader

In the film, the president is presented as having been chosen by influential figures to stabilise the nation because he is “young, athletic and a spy”. They visit him and practically plead him to become president. He replies is that he would prefer to rule from the background, desiring enduring influence.

This narrative is the Kremlin’s export myth: the detached, unwilling mastermind shaped by destiny. In reality, none of this took place.

The Reality of the Casting Call

Nobody actually pleaded with Putin to accept the role. The position was effectively a casting call with no shortage of contenders. Central to this process stood an influential oligarch from the Yeltsin era who expected to run the country de facto.

• His list included various figures, including an opposition leader later murdered and a former spy chief.
• According to a journalist who studied Putin’s biography, the future president merely met the necessary criteria: loyal, from the security services, and not a communist or a liberal.
• A businessman familiar with the events said the primary requirement was manageability and loyalty, not leadership.

“The goal wasn't a strong candidate, they needed someone controllable, someone who would follow instructions.”

Building the 007 Persona

Experts agree that the image of Putin as a powerful KGB spy was built after the fact. Stories about his clandestine activities in Dresden fall apart under examination. Fundamentally, he handled paperwork and routine duties, a low-level clerk not engaged in actual agent work.

Interestingly, the shift to depicting him as a “007” could partly have been inspired by the actor's arrival as 007. His harder version led local outlets and online audiences to make comparisons with their leader. Mashup posters swapping Craig’s face with his appeared on city centers, fueling the growing tendency to frame him as a local secret agent.

A Propaganda Win?

With Jude Law, an star popular with viewers there, the Kremlin are likely to seize the opportunity to portray this choice as a small victory. The film's omission of public dissent, the political rivals, or prominent activists in the story, even though it includes the past decade, is a welcome aspect for state propaganda.

Domestically, the president is frequently an all-powerful presence who never appears on screen. His influence is signaled through photographs or orders from on high. Now, he finally acquires a recognizable face—one that could unintentionally echo the exact legends it might seek to examine.