🔗 Share this article

Tehran is willing to restart nuclear discussions with the United States provided that it is treated with "respect" and "respect", Tehran's foreign minister has declared.

The Iranian diplomat said solely negotiations produced results, and shared fresh requests had originated from go-betweens to restart discussions with the Trump administration. He claimed Iran had zero unreported enrichment locations, and Iran had not yet reached a point to permit the International Atomic Energy Agency to visit bombed nuclear sites for security reasons.

Walking a Challenging Course

The foreign minister is walking a challenging path since Iran aims to avoid be perceived to be acting from a position of disadvantage, and he emphatically stated that Iran had arisen more powerful in military terms and emotionally from the Israeli-US attack on its enrichment centers in June.

He was speaking at a security conference in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to enrich uranium within its borders that it will never give up" – the primary cause of the impasse in the prior discussions.

Earlier Negotiations Suddenly Ended

The previous five rounds of negotiations between the United States and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and hostile end on 12 June when Israel, with Washington's assistance, targeted Tehran's atomic facilities in a fortnight-long engagement that concluded with the American leader claiming the sites had been eliminated. Afterward, Western states used their right to reinstate UN-wide sanctions, but Iran maintains they have not had a major impact.

Perfect Agreement Proposed

Iranian officials said they felt they had reached a "perfect agreement" to the nuclear fuel concern in prior discussions, when it was agreed an Iran-based consortium with American involvement could process nuclear material. Both sides would have been able to declare success since home-based processing would have continued and the US could be certain that Iran's atomic project was entirely non-military.

It had not been settled in the discussions that Washington's technical specialists could function inside Iran, but that was a reasonable assumption of the cooperative offer. Officials stated repeatedly they had reached agreement with Trump's special envoy the US official only for the deal to collapse due to "detractors in America".

Existing Situation

Iran's diplomats stated the partnership proposal was now withdrawn, but it seems very probable the proposal could be revived in various formats if talks reopen.

The US president in recent days said he had been receiving messages that Iran sought to restart talks, but in private Tehran representatives claim they are not yet getting consistent overtures from Washington either straightforwardly or from key regional mediators, such as Qatar, Egypt, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been criticized of passivity in the wake of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Tehran says dialogue is not part of a performance.

Diplomatic Stance

In his remarks to the gathering, aimed to portray the US as a controlling nation that abuses the idea of international law, the foreign minister declared the two-week conflict revealed the clash could not be settled by military means. He asserted the assaults started with a American requirement for an complete Tehran capitulation and culminated with an absolute demand for a truce.

Iran is assured the initial Israeli attacks were executed with full US knowledge and collaboration, making trust challenging to reestablish.

Negotiations Stays the Ultimate Resolution

The foreign minister said: "Tehran was not the one that had fled negotiations; it was America and the Western nations that had always sought to impose their will during the negotiations. Negotiations can still be viable and stays the ultimate solution to resolve disagreements, but its standards, guidelines and principles must be followed."

"Provided that they speak to the citizens of Tehran with the approach of dignity and honor, they will receive a answer in the identical tone."

Restoration and Rebuilding

In what is portrayed by Iran's diplomats as the struggle of repair and rebuilding, Araghchi claimed he was confident Iran's military capacities "are much stronger than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been rebuilt. We learned multiple understandings from this conflict; we have identified our own weaknesses and the vulnerabilities of the enemy."

He continued: "We managed to survive this engagement. Our enrichment knowledge, which they aimed to destroy, continues to exist. The sites and gear, if damaged, will be reconstructed; what is important is the will of the citizens of Tehran and then the unity of the country that they targeted, but did not succeed to destroy. The citizens of Tehran have developed more resilient, more integrated, and more supportive of the administration and the state in the aftermath of this assault."